Soundbars
TV soundbars compared on what actually changes the sound: the channel layout the maker claims, whether Dolby Atmos height comes from real up-firing drivers or processing, whether a subwoofer and rear speakers come in the box, the HDMI audio port you get, and how wide the bar is.
| 2.8 What Hi-Fi gave it two stars and said it sounds worse than many televisions, calling the dialogue robotic, which leaves nothing here worth the asking price. | 3.1 | Atmos (virtual height) | HDMI eARC | 37 in | |||
| 6.6 Immaculate build and the easiest setup here, but What Hi-Fi scored the sound only three out of five and cheaper rivals beat it on every measure that matters. | 5.1.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 41.1 in | |||
| 6.4 Reviewers love what it does with voices, then all report the same fault: the subwoofer runs its own race and the handover is audible. | 3.1.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 41.3 in | |||
| 7.9 Nothing else gives you real satellites for this little, but Trusted Reviews found a wireless delay on the sub and rears they could not eliminate. | 5.1.4 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 40.2 in | |||
| 8.9 RTINGS' highest-scoring system in this field, and Harman confirmed every claimed channel has its own driver, so the detachable rears are not a gimmick. | 11.1.4 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 39.3 in | |||
| 6.9 Two separate outlets gave it four stars or better as a one-box bar, and the JBL One app is better than anything else near its price. | 5.0 | Atmos (virtual height) | HDMI eARC | 32.3 in | |||
| 7.2 RTINGS rates it great for dialogue and very good for movies, which is more than the height-free design suggests, and the sub does most of the heavy lifting. | 5.1 | Atmos (virtual height) | HDMI eARC | 37 in | |||
| 6.3 What Hi-Fi found the bass swamps everything else and voices sit too far back, which no amount of EQ fixed, and the app needed restarting during testing. | 3.1.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 44 in | |||
| 8.2 Nearly all of the flagship's dialogue and bass performance for around half the outlay, though RTINGS is the only lab that has ever tested it. | 7.1.3 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 49.2 in | |||
| 8.6 WIRED and TechRadar both single out the overhead effects as the best they have heard from a bar, but two HDMI ports is stingy at this money. | 9.1.5 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 49.2 in | |||
| 3.2 No publication has reviewed this exact configuration, which is a lot of money to spend on a system nobody independent has ever measured. | 7.1.4 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 45.5 in | |||
| 6.7 Tom's Guide calls it the best bang for buck in the class while RTINGS finds the low bass missing, so it flatters TV more than film. | 3.1.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 41.2 in | |||
| 4.6 Unbeatable as a cheap streamer with speakers attached, but RTINGS rates it sub-par overall and it cannot decode Dolby Digital or DTS at all. | 2.0 | No Dolby Atmos | HDMI ARC | 9.6 in | |||
| 7.1 Tom's Guide found floor-shaking bass and crisp speech at a mid-range price, spoiled by Samsung locking room calibration to a narrow list of its own TVs. | 3.1.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 40.6 in | |||
| 8.1 TechRadar rates it the best-balanced bar of its year and it is routinely discounted, which is where its case becomes hard to argue with. | 5.1.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 43.7 in | |||
| 9.3 What Hi-Fi's 2025 award winner and the only bar here with two full HDMI 2.1 inputs, so nothing else covers this much ground at once. | 11.1.4 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 48.5 in | |||
| 6.0 Reviewers split violently on this one, with What Hi-Fi calling the soundstage centimetres wide, and it still costs more than bars that include a subwoofer. | 7.1.4 | Atmos (virtual height) | HDMI eARC | 27.6 in | |||
| 7.4 Still a five-star soundfield at its discounted price, though it is a 2022 design whose vocals smear in AMBEO mode and whose HDMI latency is the worst here. | 7.1.4 | Atmos (virtual height) | HDMI eARC | 41.3 in | |||
| 8.4 Beautifully detailed and easily the most musical bar here, though RTINGS measured far fewer real channels than Sonos claims and the app still misbehaves. | 9.1.4 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 46.4 in | |||
| 7.3 The most convincing bar of its size, and the one everyone keeps recommending over pricier rivals, provided the 2024 app collapse has not put you off Sonos. | 5.0 | Atmos (virtual height) | HDMI eARC | 25.6 in | |||
| 5.6 Fine for dialogue and the cheapest door into Sonos, but RTINGS rates it disappointing for movies and the optical-only socket is indefensible now. | 2.0 | No Dolby Atmos | None (optical only) | 22 in | |||
| 7.0 Bass well beyond its price, but Engadget had to sideload firmware from a USB stick and there is no Wi-Fi and no way to add rears later. | 3.1.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 37.4 in | |||
| 7.6 What Hi-Fi calls its Atmos the most convincing any solo bar manages, but you are buying a bar alone and Sony charges heavily for the matching sub and rears. | 7.0.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 51.2 in | |||
| 4.0 One lab has tested it, and rates it the weakest here: it folds every surround format down to stereo with no bass to fall back on. | 2.0 | Atmos (virtual height) | HDMI eARC | 31.9 in | |||
| 5.0 RTINGS is effectively the only lab that has touched it, and even they found the rotating drivers add almost no sense of height. | 5.1.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 36 in | |||
| 5.4 Tom's Guide liked the rumble but described voices as flat and tinny even with Yamaha's clarity mode on, which is the wrong flaw for a TV speaker. | 2.1 | Atmos (virtual height) | HDMI eARC | 35.9 in | |||
| 6.5 TechHive calls it outstanding value at street prices, though reviewers agree the height effects never climb above the top of the television. | 2.1.2 | Atmos (up-firing drivers) | HDMI eARC | 40 in |
How the AI score works, and who wrote it
A language model rated these, not a test lab. Every score from 1 to 10 is an AI assessment of how good the product is against the other 27 in this comparison, formed from the specifications we verified plus the published lab reviews and owner reception found while researching each one. Nobody at Slopsheets listened to, wore or plugged in any of it.
It weighs the things a spec table cannot show: how a product is actually reviewed, how well the software works, build quality, and what you get for the money. That is deliberate. An earlier version of this column was pure arithmetic on the table and it ranked a bundle of cheap boxes above a class-leading single unit, because counting hardware is not the same as judging it.
Treat it as an informed starting point and read the sourced comparison, not as a verdict. The score is relative to this comparison only, so it means nothing across categories, and it carries no price, star rating or review count. Every specification behind it is sourced and checked; the score on top of them is opinion.
More sheets like this
good for games a lotsmall apartment