Comparison sheet · 28 models

Portable Bluetooth Speakers

Portable Bluetooth speakers compared on the specs that survive contact with a beach bag: rated playtime, ingress protection, weight, whether they link to other speakers, and whether they can charge your phone.

Portable Bluetooth Speakers · spec comparison
Anker Soundcore Boom 2 Plus8.5Owners rate it above reviewers, which almost never happens; huge clean bass and a real 9-band EQ for roughly half what JBL charges for this volume.20 hoursIPX78.38 lbYesYes5.3
Anker Soundcore Motion 3007.8Beats its own battery rating, has the best app under $100, and images well once EQ'd, but treble is dull and it distorts when pushed.13 hoursIPX71.71 lbYesNo5.3
Anker Soundcore Select 4 Go7.6Absurd value at roughly twenty dollars with a 9-band EQ and real endurance, held back by sharp highs, no volume, and rubber feet that peel.20 hoursIP670.58 lbYesNo5.4
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)7.5TechRadar's Editor's Choice and a four-star What Hi-Fi verdict: composed, punchy sound in a repairable, battery-replaceable shell, held back only by what rivals give you for less.24 hoursIP671.27 lbYesNo5.1
Beats Pill (2024)6.8Fine at a discount, but the mids are buried, there is no EQ at all, and owners report overheating and playback dropping out.24 hoursIP671.5 lbYesYes5.3Beats’ own page says only “Class 1 Bluetooth” with no version. 5.3 comes from Apple’s spec sheet as reported by 9to5Mac.
JBL Boombox 48.2Nothing else here comes close on volume or runtime, but it pumps and compresses when pushed, and drop tests made it shut itself off.28 hoursIP6813 lbYesYes5.4
JBL Charge 69.2The default answer in this field: genuinely loud, tough enough to abuse, best app of the bunch, and street pricing that undercuts everything comparable.24 hoursIP682.11 lbYesYes5.4
JBL Clip 58.0Punches far past its size and price, takes real abuse on a bag strap, and gets a proper EQ; it just turns shrill wide open.12 hoursIP670.63 lbYesNo5.3
JBL Flip 78.6Distortion is dramatically better controlled than the Flip 6 and it survives more abuse, so the halved real-world battery is a fair trade at street price.14 hoursIP681.23 lbYesNo5.4
JBL Go 46.0Comfortably outlasts its own battery rating and gets a real EQ, but it compresses and hisses when pushed, and the Clip 5 is worth the stretch.7 hoursIP67Best in column0.42 lbYesNo5.3
JBL Xtreme 46.6Weakest-sounding big JBL: nearly mono imaging, bass distorting from about seventy percent, and it has already been superseded at a similar price.24 hoursIP674.63 lbYesYes5.3
Marshall Emberton III8.0Trusted Reviews and TechRadar both praise the balance and honest battery, but it turns harsh wide open and Marshall gives you presets instead of a real EQ.Best in column32 hoursIP671.48 lbNoNo5.3
Marshall Middleton6.3Discontinued and heavily discounted, which is the only reason to consider it: SBC-only Bluetooth, soft midrange, four pounds, and a master of nothing.20 hoursIP673.97 lbYesYes5.1
Marshall Willen II6.4Holds its tone almost to maximum and shrugs off anything, though Consumer Reports found the midrange grainy and congested; the recent price drop is what saves it.17 hoursIP670.79 lbNoNo5.3
Sonos Move 26.1The battery genuinely lasts and it doubles as a proper home speaker, but it is too heavy to carry, cannot get wet, and rivals sound better for less.24 hoursIP566.61 lbYesYes5.0
Sonos Roam 26.2Sounds bigger than it looks and reviewers rate the audio well, but Sonos app setup is a genuine ordeal and cheaper speakers beat it sonically.10 hoursIP670.95 lbYesNo5.2
Sony SRS-XB1007.4Does one job, personal listening, better than anything at fifty dollars, but treble is muddy and it audibly compresses at the top of the dial.16 hoursIP670.6 lbYesNo5.3
Sony ULT Field 16.4Thin without the bass button and bloated with it, and Sony will not let you EQ the good preset, though the battery beats its rating.12 hoursIP671.43 lbYesNo5.3
Sony ULT Field 35.5Real endurance and a fun bass preset, but What Hi-Fi found it forgettable, TechRadar was let down by the audio, and the EQ cannot match the ULT mode.24 hoursIP672.65 lbYesYes5.2Sony’s regional spec pages state 5.2 and SoundGuys states 5.3. We record the manufacturer’s figure.
Sony ULT Field 55.9Trusted Reviews gave it four stars for loud, punchy party sound, but it is heavy, the ULT presets cannot be edited, and rivals do it for less.25 hoursIP677.28 lbYesYes5.3
Tribit StormBox Blast 27.7TechRadar gave it four and a half stars for controlled, huge bass while undercutting JBL's boombox, though mids blur and it is brutally heavy.30 hoursIP6715.76 lbYesYes5.4
Ultimate Ears BOOM 47.0Loud with little compression and famously indestructible, but the treble is veiled, there is no multipoint, and USB-C is the only real upgrade.15 hoursIP671.37 lbYesNon/aUltimate Ears does not publish a Bluetooth version for the BOOM 4, and no lab-grade review states one. A single low-authority site claims 5.1, which was not enough to record it as fact.
Ultimate Ears EPICBOOM6.2Four stars from both TechRadar and Tom's Guide for balanced, room-filling sound, but the adaptive EQ does nothing, it lacks energy, and Sonos does more for the money.17 hoursIP674.36 lbYesNo5.3
Ultimate Ears MEGABOOM 46.9TechRadar scored it four stars: real volume and unchanged pricing, though it muddles busy rock and only comes alive once you turn it up.20 hoursIP672.06 lbYesNo5.2Ultimate Ears omits the Bluetooth version from its own spec sheet. 5.2 comes from TechRadar’s review spec table, not from the manufacturer.
Ultimate Ears WONDERBOOM 46.5Tough, floats, and easy to live with, but DSP strangles the bass past sixty percent and there is no app whatsoever.14 hoursIP670.93 lbYesNo5.2
How the AI score works, and who wrote it

A language model rated these, not a test lab. Every score from1 to 10 is an AI assessment of how good the product is against the other 28 in this comparison, formed from the specifications we verified plus the published lab reviews and owner reception found while researching each one. Nobody at Slopsheets listened to, wore or plugged in any of it.

It weighs the things a spec table cannot show: how a product is actually reviewed, how well the software works, build quality, and what you get for the money. That is deliberate. An earlier version of this column was pure arithmetic on the table and it ranked a bundle of cheap boxes above a class-leading single unit, because counting hardware is not the same as judging it.

Treat it as an informed starting point and read the sourced comparison, not as a verdict. The score is relative to this comparison only, so it means nothing across categories, and it carries no price, star rating or review count. Every specification behind it is sourced and checked; the score on top of them is opinion.