GaN USB-C Chargers
GaN wall chargers compared on what actually decides which one to buy: total wattage, how many devices they feed at once, the real output of the top port, PPS support, and whether the prongs fold for travel.
 Anker 735 Charger (Nano II 65W) | 8.6Still the default one-brick travel answer, cheap and pocketable, but the two-device split drops the main port to 45W and three devices leaves it at 40W. | 65 W | 65 W | 3 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Anker 737 Charger (GaNPrime 120W) | 7.4Was the flagship, and it stays cool, but it is chunky and Anker's own Prime line now does similar work for less money in less space. | 120 W | 100 W | 3 | 2 | ||
 Anker Nano Charger (30W) | 8.0One port, no sharing problems, and it disappears in a pocket; it does exactly one job and does it cheaply and well. | 30 W | 30 W | 1 | 1 | ||
 Anker Prime 100W GaN Wall Charger | 9.3The one to beat: laptop-grade 100W, three ports and folding prongs in a body around 40 percent smaller than Apple's brick, for roughly fifty dollars. | 100 W | 100 W | 3 | 2 | ||
 Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger | 8.8Half the size of Apple's 67W brick with two extra ports, and it regularly drops near thirty-five dollars, which is the best value in this table. | 67 W | 67 W | 3 | 2 | ||
 Anker Prime Charger (250W, 6 Ports) | 8.2Genuinely the smartest desktop charger here with per-port readouts and priority control, but it is fixed-plug, expensive and total overkill for most desks. | 250 W | 140 W | 6 | 4 | ||
 Apple 140W USB-C Power Adapter | 5.0Rock-steady 140W with no power-sharing games, but it is enormous, single-port, PPS-free and among the priciest things here. | 140 W | 140 W | 1 | 1 | ||
 Apple 35W Dual USB-C Port Power Adapter | 4.0Fifty-nine dollars for 35W that splits to 17.5W each, so charging a MacBook alongside a phone takes roughly 75 percent longer. | 35 W | 35 W | 2 | 2 | ||
 Baseus 240W Digital GaN Desktop Charger | 7.2The display, app control and DC output are fun, but it is a large fixed desktop unit and the load split falls off fast past the first port. | 240 W | 140 W | 5 | 3 | ||
 Baseus GaN5 Pro 65W USB-C Wall Charger | 8.1Absurdly small for 65W and covers almost every fast-charge protocol including PPS, so it punches far above what it costs. | 65 W | 65 W | 3 | 2 | ||
 Baseus GaN6 Pro 100W USB-C Charger | 5.9Beyond one enthusiast bench video, nobody credible has tested this exact model, so we cannot stand behind it the way we can the Chargerlab-verified GaN5 Pro. | 100 W | 100 W | 4 | 2 | ||
 Belkin BoostCharge Dual USB-C GaN Wall Charger 68W | 3.5The headline 68W hides bad port logic: the second port is stuck at 18W and the main one drops to 50W, with no PPS and fixed prongs. | 68 W | 60 W | 2 | 2 | ||
 Belkin BoostCharge Pro 140W 4-Port GaN Wall Charger | 8.0Real 140W on one port plus swappable international plugs makes it a strong travel brick, though it is bulky and priced like a premium accessory. | 140 W | 140 W | 4 | 3 | ||
 Belkin BoostCharge Pro 4-Port GaN Charger 108W | 6.1Reviewers confirmed it does what Belkin claims across Apple, Samsung and Dell hardware with a two-year warranty, so the only real sting is the premium asking price. | 108 W | 96 W | 4 | 2 | ||
 Google 45W USB-C Power Charger | 6.0Basically mandatory if you want a top Pixel at full speed, otherwise a single fixed-prong port at a price that buys a multi-port GaN elsewhere. | 45 W | 45 W | 1 | 1 | ||
 Samsung 45W USB-C Super Fast Charging Power Adapter | 5.8Reliable Super Fast Charging 2.0 for Galaxy owners, but one port, no folding prongs and nothing to offer anyone outside Samsung's ecosystem. | 45 W | 45 W | 1 | 1 | ||
 Satechi 100W USB-C PD Wall Charger | 5.4AppleInsider found it charges a 16-inch MacBook Pro at full speed without cooking itself, then recommended Satechi's own three-port model instead for barely any more. | 100 W | 100 W | 1 | 1 | ||
 Satechi 145W USB-C 4-Port GaN Travel Charger | 6.8Four USB-C ports and travel adapters for the money is fair, but no PPS and two ports capped at 45W limit who it actually suits. | 145 W | 140 W | 4 | 4 | ||
 UGREEN Nexode 100W GaN Charger (4-Port) | 7.6Four ports and honest power, but the output changes the moment any cable is inserted and the wide body blocks the second outlet. | 100 W | 100 W | 4 | 3 | ||
 UGREEN Nexode 140W GaN Charger (3-Port) | 7.8Delivers full 140W for a MacBook Pro but is visibly bigger than the newer Pro model that fits more ports in less space. | 140 W | 140 W | 3 | 2 | ||
 UGREEN Nexode 45W GaN Charger (2-Port) | 7.9Independent bench testing pulled a near-full 42W and 9to5Mac scored it perfect, remarkable at its budget asking price, though it pauses output when you swap devices. | 45 W | 45 W | 2 | 2 | ||
 UGREEN Nexode 65W GaN Charger (3-Port) | 8.3Does the sensible thing: 65W solo, folding prongs, three ports, PPS for Samsung and Pixel, and a price well under the Apple and Belkin equivalents. | 65 W | 65 W | 3 | 2 | ||
 UGREEN Nexode Pro 100W GaN Charger (3-Port) | 7.7Shrinks 100W to the size of a 65W brick, but fixed prongs and a 65W/30W two-device split undercut the premium the Pro badge asks for. | 100 W | 100 W | 3 | 2 | ||
 UGREEN Nexode Pro 160W GaN Charger (4-Port) | 9.0Rare high-wattage charger that stays sane when loaded, holding 100W and 60W on two devices instead of gutting the top port, though the price stings. | 160 W | 140 W | 4 | 3 |
How the AI score works, and who wrote it
A language model rated these, not a test lab. Every score from1 to 10 is an AI assessment of how good the product is against the other 24 in this comparison, formed from the specifications we verified plus the published lab reviews and owner reception found while researching each one. Nobody at Slopsheets listened to, wore or plugged in any of it.
It weighs the things a spec table cannot show: how a product is actually reviewed, how well the software works, build quality, and what you get for the money. That is deliberate. An earlier version of this column was pure arithmetic on the table and it ranked a bundle of cheap boxes above a class-leading single unit, because counting hardware is not the same as judging it.
Treat it as an informed starting point and read the sourced comparison, not as a verdict. The score is relative to this comparison only, so it means nothing across categories, and it carries no price, star rating or review count. Every specification behind it is sourced and checked; the score on top of them is opinion.