← Slopsheets ResearchData study · 18 models measured

Portable power stations: watt-hours per pound across the 2026 field

Energy density for 18 portable power stations runs from 27 to 52 Wh per pound. Two stations of the same capacity can differ by 22 lb.

UPDATED 2026-07-22SOURCE: SLOPSHEETS CATALOG
Key findings
Capacity vs weight, 18 power stations (2026). Steeper from the origin means more Wh per pound. Green: densest and least dense.01,0002,0003,0004,0000255075100JackeryBluettiWeight (lb)Capacity (Wh)
Capacity vs weight, 18 power stations (2026). Steeper from the origin means more Wh per pound. Green: densest and least dense.

Capacity is the number everyone quotes. It is the wrong one.

Power stations are sold on watt-hours. Bigger number, more marketing. But two 2042 Wh stations in this set, Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 and Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus, weigh 39.5 lb and 61.5 lb. Same capacity,22 extra pounds. On the chart that is the difference between a steep line from the origin and a shallow one; the slope is energy density, and it is the number that decides whether the thing actually goes camping or lives next to the wall forever.

What the spread looks like

Across 18 stations, density runs 26.5 to 51.7 Wh per pound, with the middle of the field near 36. Jackery Explorer 2000 v2 tops it at51.7; Bluetti EB3A sits at the bottom near 26.5. That is close to a 2x range in how much energy you carry per pound, hiding behind capacity numbers that look interchangeable on a shelf.

Small stations carry more dead weight

The low end of the density range is dominated by the smallest units. Every station pays a fixed tax in housing, the AC inverter, ports, and a display, and that tax is a larger fraction of a 300 Wh station than a 2000 Wh one. So the compact models people expect to be the most portable are often the least efficient per pound. Portability is real, but you are buying convenience, not density.

Chemistry is not the whole story

Nearly every station here uses LiFePO4, prized for cycle life and safety. The one exception on a different chemistry does not beat the LiFePO4 average on density, which is the tell: at this size, generation and packaging (how tightly the pack, inverter, and case are built) move Wh per pound more than the cell chemistry named on the box. Judge the finished product, not the chemistry label.

Methodology

Figures are manufacturer-stated capacity (Wh) and weight (lb) for the 18 portable power stations in the Slopsheets catalog as of 2026-07-22, with density derived as capacity divided by weight. We store no scraped or live-priced data; this is a spec-sheet aggregation, refreshed as the catalog updates.

The full field, ranked by density

18 power stations: capacity, weight, chemistry, and derived Wh per pound
ModelCapacity (Wh)Weight (lb)Wh / lbChemistry
Jackery Explorer 2000 v22,04239.551.7LiFePO4
Anker SOLIX C2000 (Gen 2)2,04841.749.1LiFePO4
Jackery Explorer 1000 v21,07023.845.0LiFePO4
EcoFlow RIVER 2 Pro76817.244.7LiFePO4
EcoFlow DELTA 2 Max2,0485041.0LiFePO4
Bluetti Elite 200 V22,07453.438.8LiFePO4
EcoFlow DELTA 21,0242737.9LiFePO4
Anker SOLIX C10001,05628.437.2LiFePO4
EcoFlow DELTA Pro3,6009936.4LiFePO4
DJI Power 10001,02428.735.7LiFePO4
Anker SOLIX C3002888.334.7LiFePO4
Jackery Explorer 300 Plus2888.334.7LiFePO4
Goal Zero Yeti 70067720.333.3LiFePO4
Goal Zero Yeti 1500X1,51645.633.2NMC lithium-ion
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus2,04261.533.2LiFePO4
Bluetti AC1801,15235.332.6LiFePO4
EcoFlow RIVER 3 Plus28610.427.5LiFePO4
Bluetti EB3A26810.126.5LiFePO4
Cite this study

Slopsheets, "Portable power stations: watt-hours per pound across the 2026 field." Updated 2026-07-22. https://slopsheets.com/research/portable-power-station-energy-density/